Community Engagement Strategy

A group of people seated around tables in a hall holding small signs that read 'yes absolutely'

“Community engagement helps communities shape their own futures and informs the vision and direction of council.” - Office of Local Government

What is the Community Engagement Strategy?

The Community Engagement Strategy (CES) outlines how we engage with our community when developing plans, policies, programs, and key activities. It sets clear guidelines for how, when, and with who we engage, ensuring that every step of the process is transparent and accountable.

The 2025–2029 CES replaces the Community Engagement Protocol from 2019, in line with requirements from the Office of Local Government.

The CES also includes our Community Participation Plan (CPP), which outlines engagement processes for planning matters under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

Read the full Community Engagement Strategy

How we engage

  • 1. Assess project impact

    We evaluate each project’s potential impact on the community, categorising it as high or low, to allow us to determine the engagement level. High-impact projects may include LGA-wide strategies or major budget changes, whereas lower impact projects may include park upgrades or street works. This step also involves identifying associated risks and opportunities.

  • 2. Determine engagement level

    We determine the appropriate level of community input required based on the impact identified in Step 1. This ensures that the engagement strategy aligns with the project’s importance and influence, providing a clear and effective pathway for community involvement.

  • 3. Develop communications and engagement plan

    We create a detailed plan outlining who, when, and how we will engage. This plan ensures clarity, sets expectations, and maintains transparency throughout the engagement process.

  • 4. Implement the plan

    We execute the engagement plan using tailored methods to actively gather input from the community. This step ensures that participation is in line with the project’s assessed impact and engagement level.

  • 5. Analyse feedback

    We review and evaluate the collected feedback to identify key themes and insights. This analysis helps guide decision-making by highlighting community concerns and preferences.

  • 6. Make the decision

    Informed by community input and the project’s impact, we make decisions that reflect the feedback received. This integration of insights ensures that outcomes are aligned with both community needs and project objectives.

  • 7. Close the loop

    We report back to the community on how their input influenced the final decision. This step includes evaluating the engagement process and identifying areas for improvement, ensuring transparency and demonstrating the value of community participation.

Evaluating and measuring success

We evaluate the effectiveness of engagement activities as well as community satisfaction using four key indicators: Principles, Implementation, Reach and Outcomes. We use the insights from this process to continuously improve our engagement practices.

Principles

Implementation

  • Was engagement delivered in line with Council’s engagement principles?

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • How well were we able to implement our engagement plan?
  • Did participants have a clear understanding of the purpose of the engagement?
  • Were the engagement methods selected appropriate for the targeted group/participants?
  • Did the engagement methods selected successfully consider the scope of engagement, timeline and resources available?
  • How effectively were any barriers to engagement managed?

Reach

Outcomes

  • Were the people reached through the engagement representative of those affected by the decision or outcome?
  • Statistics collected: number of submissions/responses, visits to YourSay website, participants in engagement events / surveys etc
  • Did we achieve our desired result?
  • Were the contributions provided by participants relevant and realistic?
  • How well did we ‘close the loop’ with participants on the results of the engagement?